piq - pixel art maker

producing pixel art at 16.86193 pixels per second
sign in
select your language:


by S23 SYLAR

change background | view actual size (100 x 100 pixels)

09 March 2017 00:37
colour distribution

"Oasis" Rock Band (based on fan art)


[this comment was deleted by LudicrousCookie]
by LudicrousCookie, 09 March 2017 12:49
This was done by photo-pixel conversion software?
by Jankovic123, 09 March 2017 13:19
I really don't think it's THAT good, but thank you!
(my reply to both comments)
by S23 SYLAR, 09 March 2017 15:44
Mine wasn't really a compliemnt, because the heads look like their faces were converted to pixels in photoshop, and copied roughly into piq.
by Jankovic123, 09 March 2017 16:06
If it looks like that to you, that's a compliment.
by S23 SYLAR, 09 March 2017 16:14
don't take it as one, I found the ref, and its clearly been processed into pixels from that.
by Jankovic123, 09 March 2017 16:37
I presume you're just gonna ignore this, and continue luring weak minded cunts into thinking you have some kind of skill for some sort of masturbatory pleasure.
by Jankovic123, 09 March 2017 17:18
Well aren't you just a pessimistic cuntbag, maybe get over yourself and stop being jealous because you can't get over the fact that someone has more talent than you. Maybe just praise the artist for making really good pixel art, instead of trying to "exposed" them for some stupid bullshit you're trying to pull. Oh, and maybe SYLAR didn't respond to you because they're smart enough to know that you're just a selfish dickbag and aren't worth their attention. Go do the world a favor and suck a dick.
by sagefire925, 10 March 2017 01:52
Haha, listen kid, I know you are a bit slow, but let me put this in simplest terms:

He copied this image pixel for pixel.

If that counts as talent, then fuck me, why dont we all just rip each other's art off. And, Im not concerned about being popular, considering I do have more subscribers than him, so YOU do the world a favour: garrote youself.
by Jankovic123, 10 March 2017 11:00
Sorry sage but this isn't complicated, Sylar is a self obsessed talentless hack and anyone with a brain stem on this site had known about it for ages. He's been caught on more than one occasion copying images he's found online pixel for pixel and at best he's Mabey slowed down temporarily before hopping right back into it. He knows people ignore it, he knows he can rely on his apparent surface "talent" to defend himself and he knows that nobody will ever take the issue seriously enough to out him permanently and at least give him a reputation worthy of someone with such a blatant lack of skill.
by Lumpkins, 10 March 2017 12:03
I'm pretty sure the only reason Sylar is praised at all is not because of stupid people but probably more because of new users that have not seen these incidents exposing Sylar's shittiness.
These new users are probably coming at just a fast enough rate to add more to Sylar's undeserved popularity
by ArtRager, 10 March 2017 12:27
Exactly, thats a better way to put it i touched on in conversation with Jank yesterday, old tricks, new people. cant blame them fully for there naivety as i said from the surface he looks like someone with talent, i just implore people to look further into it before supporting this wannabe.
by Lumpkins, 10 March 2017 12:30
True, so sagefire you absolute spastic. The issue is that there will always be noobs like sagefire, who follow the crowd, who were told to hate Jankovic because he dares criticise something. wanker
by Jankovic123, 10 March 2017 13:27
But hes a talentless wanker, who bots and probably viewhacks like every other ref cunt on this site.
by Jankovic123, 10 March 2017 13:27
My stuff looks like shit and i am proud
by TheIronworks, 10 March 2017 14:05
Sage is an old user, but then again he might've just been inactive or not payzing attention when Sylar was shown to be copying.
by ArtRager, 10 March 2017 14:13
What about cesarloose?
by Lemmino Pixel Comments, 11 March 2017 14:50
Has Cesarloose ever been caught copying stuff?
I don't really pay attention to this stuff all the time.
by ArtRager, 11 March 2017 14:53
I don't know but he was reaaallllyyy good at drawing pictures as if they were jpeg images.
by Lemmino Pixel Comments, 11 March 2017 14:54
Oh yeah, I've looked around a bit in his gallery and I may have found an example of a copied piq, but I'm not sure.
by ArtRager, 11 March 2017 14:59

There is many that are questionable.
by Lemmino Pixel Comments, 11 March 2017 15:01
That one seems like it could, and I found a few piqs of masks in his gallery that when I searched them in google linked to another site (though I'm not sure if he copied the site or if the site stole his stuff)
by ArtRager, 11 March 2017 15:24
yeah others who have done this are
-Stryder's bot
by Jankovic123, 11 March 2017 15:35
Yeah, I saw Pikalink reveal Ryph's copying a while ago,
I've never heard of Chasegame honestly,
and Stryder's bot is just what he's using to test pixel conversion programs so Stryder isn't really at fault
by ArtRager, 11 March 2017 15:38
yeah I know, but there are 2 issues here:


Pixelating images online and copying them is banned but, refwhoring is a way of doing something for attention, without needing any skill at all.
by Jankovic123, 11 March 2017 15:40
still not replying sylar huh you snake.
by Jankovic123, 11 March 2017 17:48
@S23 Sylar Can you show us the picture you said it was based off of so I can compare it and see if it was truly copied myself?
by 10Ggames, 11 March 2017 19:38
He wont show you it, but I got it for you right here:

Fucking identical.
by Jankovic123, 11 March 2017 22:11
Of course, the ref wasn't pixelated, but Sylar making the piq still took absolutely no creativity on his part.
by ArtRager, 11 March 2017 23:09
I must admit, it is pretty close.
One this i saw that could be differentiated was that there were a few lighter marks in the hair of the guy on the left in the pixel art that is not really in some parts of the real picture, the only other is that the sign on the guy to the right's shoulder looks a little more square that the one in the picture if it was converted, however I am not one to say as I have not any of experience pixelating images. I will compare them by doing the same thing myself to truly see.
by 10Ggames, 12 March 2017 00:20
My analasis is that when I pixelated the image, the super white spots on the skin were not that bright, and yes I was correct, the signs would have looked a lot more detailed if pixelated through the method which I used to pixelate directly. Sylar could only have copied it if she/he used the wrong colors and miscalculated when sizing up the image to perfect square.
by 10Ggames, 12 March 2017 00:29
To give context and maybe shed some more light on the issue, the first piq i noticed him doing this on was this (http://piq.codeus.net/picture/334994/headless_horseman)

which was very obviously this


Now notice there not 1 for 1, but its obviously the same damn image taken pixel for pixel aside from a few details. It isnt just ref whoring when every single on of his images is obviously just downright meticulously copied pixel for pixel from either conversion or bitcrunching. its easy to find the original sources to every single one of his images, this one isnt a lone example, and just because your specific pixilization method isnt syncing 100% or he might have changed 1 minor detail to try to throw off the scent its still extremely obviously what hes doing.
by Lumpkins, 12 March 2017 00:53
I'm just sayin' the possibilities, not saying he did not copy it.
by 10Ggames, 12 March 2017 00:56
Im just sayin hes very obviously specifically made it so there's just the technical possibility that he did not copy it, anyone with the ability to read between the lines and put 2 and 2 together can obviously see what the guys doing, especially considering he cant even deny it publicly
by Lumpkins, 12 March 2017 01:02
completely true
by 10Ggames, 12 March 2017 01:06
So of course he did copy it. The reason he went over some of the colours was probably to prevent the image search to lead directly to the original photo.
by Jankovic123, 12 March 2017 12:04
So maybe we could start a PSA-like thing to make sure new users at least consider the possibility that these new users cheat?
by ArtRager, 12 March 2017 12:19
I dunno what a PSA could be...
by Jankovic123, 12 March 2017 12:21
Like a group account that makes different PSAs or something?
Like the old, but admittedly failed, Anti-Pika Force.
Maybe Piq is set up in a way that makes it pretty much impossible to make a "PSA account" but we should find some way to spread the word.

We could make a PSA account or convince a high-ranking, active, non-refwhore user to make a Piq explaining why these refwhores cheat.
by ArtRager, 12 March 2017 12:31
Haha, I started the anti-pika force :). Maybe I should make a piq explaining some of the rules of the site?
by Jankovic123, 12 March 2017 12:49
I'm not sure if you have enough subs to spread the message that far.
I could also be overestimating what we can actually do.
And the APF was a good effort, thanks for trying.
by ArtRager, 12 March 2017 12:54
If I get enough likes on the piq it could get PoTD ect, I'll do it regardless.
by Jankovic123, 12 March 2017 12:56
Alright, everyone might as well try.
I might make a piq as well that talks about how ref users are generally cheaters as well as talk about some other stuff (not a rant though)
by ArtRager, 12 March 2017 13:01
yeah alright.
by Jankovic123, 12 March 2017 13:01
Ill ask tom
by Jankovic123, 12 March 2017 20:33
They are mean to each other and their audience. (Oasis)
by Shippie2, 15 March 2017 22:05
Jank, absolute legend, you exposed the crap out of them and got them to not even reply to you out of guilt
truely, i have mad respect for you my dude
by cyrus, 17 March 2017 15:44
I know, thanks, but dont post on old threads because all people above get notified.
by Jankovic123, 17 March 2017 17:38
ok but what's so bad about copying? he put the ref in the description so what's so bad?
by LWH123, 20 March 2017 20:48
pixel for pixel, after pixelating image= chating

also using refs itself is not against the rules, but all good users know its wrong.

Stop necroing dead threads, and next time use your fucking brain.
by Jankovic123, 20 March 2017 21:18
But it's sorta not really a ref?

Kinda just "based off fanart"
I mean he is admitting that it's not his own creative work but there is a way to still post links without getting deleted.

Actually I'm not even 100% sure the site is deleting links anymore
And Jankovic, "necroing" can't really be that goddamn annoying to be an excuse to act like that.
by ArtRager, 20 March 2017 21:22
he was pissing me off beforehand.
by Jankovic123, 20 March 2017 21:31
by LWH123, 20 March 2017 22:24
from the day before.
by Jankovic123, 20 March 2017 22:31
The Notifications tho XD
by 10Ggames, 20 March 2017 22:32
by LWH123, 20 March 2017 22:45
Whoah, the shitbag S23 SYLAR just lost himself a followr
by creeperblewup, 30 March 2017 18:56
good, but also dont necro plz.
by Jankovic123, 30 March 2017 18:59
you need to be logged in to comment
what's going on now
rterteafy signed up to piq
20 January 08:44:03
catzndragonz commented on
20 January 04:55:18
someone drew , , ,
20 January 04:11:32
20 January 04:05:22
SopranoCicada liked , , , , , ,
20 January 03:51:16
kgreen2023: view my photo
20 January 03:44:38
20 January 03:43:35
kgreen2023 signed up to piq
20 January 03:42:22
TheWolfInside liked , , ,
20 January 03:26:31
TheWolfInside branched from
20 January 03:22:28
20 January 03:22:27
20 January 03:18:17
show more
pixel art feedback